ohadsoft.com
The case of the crashing std::thread destructor and why you should use tasks instead of threads – OhadSoft
https://www.ohadsoft.com/2015/01/the-case-of-the-crashing-stdthread-destructor-and-why-you-should-use-tasks-instead-of-threads
The case of the crashing std: thread destructor and why you should use tasks instead of threads. I recently encountered an interesting crash in our iOS application at work. Here’s the relevant stack trace section:. Libc abi.dylib std: terminate() libc .1.dylib std: 1: thread: thread(). Luckily, the documentation for std: thread. Provides us with the root cause:. If *this has an associated thread (joinable() = true), std: terminate() is called. Specifically, the joinable() documentation. Click to share on...
ohadsc.wordpress.com
The case of the crashing std::thread destructor and why you should use tasks instead of threads | Programs & Programming (Moved to OhadSoft.com)
https://ohadsc.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/the-case-of-the-crashing-stdthread-destructor-and-why-you-should-use-tasks-instead-of-threads
Programs and Programming (Moved to OhadSoft.com). Home of StreamRecorder.NET. Laquo; 2014 in review. In C , even a thread is not thread-safe (or: why you should use tasks part 2). The case of the crashing std: thread destructor and why you should use tasks instead of threads. You are reading the old blog! This post has been moved to http:/ www.ohadsoft.com/2015/01/the-case-of-the-crashing-stdthread-destructor-and-why-you-should-use-tasks-instead-of-threads/. Luckily, the documentation for std: thread.