bigdatasocialscience.com
Book Contents and Contributors - Big Data and Social Science
http://www.bigdatasocialscience.com/contents
Big Data and Social Science. Book Contents and Contributors. Book Contents and Contributors. Book Contents and Contributors. This section provides a brief overview of the goals and structure of the book. View the full contents of Chapter 1. Working with Web Data and APIs. University of Chicago,. Metadata Technology North America. Programming with Big Data. City University of New York,. II Modeling and Analysis. University of Chicago,. View the full contents of Chapter 6. American Institutes for Research,.
hci-user-advocate.blogspot.com
HCI User Advocate: Books I've Read Visualization
http://hci-user-advocate.blogspot.com/2015/01/books-ive-read-visualization.html
Software makers and users often have conflicting goals - with the makers winning. Yet they all too often shoot themselves in the foot by distrusting the users - their customers. Or worse, maltreating them. It is time to get angry about bad and malicious software design. This Blog calls software designers on the carpet - giving them credit and shame where they deserve it. January 2, 2015. Books I've Read Visualization. A free and general tool built by Adil Yalcin. This approach lets you see things like mo...
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
On Tone | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/on-tone-2
Visualization Analysis and Design. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. Middot; Leave a comment. Contextual note: this post is one of several on the memorability debate. Punching Up vs Punching Down. I need to think more about exactly why that social convention exists. My first speculation is that it’s a reaction to the strong hierarchical system of academia. Senior people have direct power over more junior ones in so many ways (hiring, reviews, tenure) that ...8211; that ...
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
January | 2016 | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/2016/01
Visualization Analysis and Design. Monthly Archives: January 2016. On the InfoVis Review Process. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. Middot; 3 Comments. Contextual note: this post is one of several on the memorability debate. The process of reviewing papers is relevant in this memorability discussion, since the Few15 critique specifically called into question whether the peer review process at InfoVis yields appropriate quality. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner.
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
December | 2015 | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/2015/12
Visualization Analysis and Design. Monthly Archives: December 2015. Fell In Love With Data Stories. December 13, 2015. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Vis Community. Middot; 1 Comment. Time for a Blog. December 13, 2015. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Meta. Middot; 2 Comments. OK, it’s finally time to do this blog thing. I’ve found I want a place for things in the middle – by which I mean many things. On the InfoVis Review Process. On The Memorability Debate. Fell In Love With Data Stories.
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
On the InfoVis Review Process | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/on-the-infovis-review-process
Visualization Analysis and Design. On the InfoVis Review Process. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. Middot; 3 Comments. Contextual note: this post is one of several on the memorability debate. The process of reviewing papers is relevant in this memorability discussion, since the Few15 critique specifically called into question whether the peer review process at InfoVis yields appropriate quality. Papers as a Mix of Strengths and Weaknesses. Update: in a subsequent post].
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
On the InfoVis Review Process | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/on-the-infovis-review-process/comment-page-1
Visualization Analysis and Design. On the InfoVis Review Process. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. Middot; 3 Comments. Contextual note: this post is one of several on the memorability debate. The process of reviewing papers is relevant in this memorability discussion, since the Few15 critique specifically called into question whether the peer review process at InfoVis yields appropriate quality. Papers as a Mix of Strengths and Weaknesses. Update: in a subsequent post].
tamaramunzner.wordpress.com
TamaraMunzner | Vis & More
https://tamaramunzner.wordpress.com/author/tamaramunzner
Visualization Analysis and Design. On the InfoVis Review Process. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. Middot; 3 Comments. Contextual note: this post is one of several on the memorability debate. The process of reviewing papers is relevant in this memorability discussion, since the Few15 critique specifically called into question whether the peer review process at InfoVis yields appropriate quality. January 17, 2016. Middot; by TamaraMunzner. Middot; in Memorability. IR...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT