climateofsophistry.com
Religion of Climate Change Part 5: Cold Gods don’t create Hot Gods | Climate of Sophistry
https://climateofsophistry.com/2015/04/28/religion-of-climate-change-part-5-cold-gods-dont-create-hot-gods
Climate science is sophistry…i.e., BS. About Climate of Sophistry. The Atmosphere does not “Pile Heat”. Climate Change Reconsidered II by Marty Hertzberg →. Religion of Climate Change Part 5: Cold Gods don’t create Hot Gods. Going for it in the Open. I identified years ago that climate alarm via the sophistically-named “atmospheric greenhouse effect” was the new religion for atheists, new agers, and other types of idiots in general:. Get this quote from the first link, from the Secretary of the UN:.
climateofsophistry.com
Climate Change Reconsidered II – by Marty Hertzberg | Climate of Sophistry
https://climateofsophistry.com/2015/05/13/climate-change-reconsidered-ii-by-marty-hertzberg
Climate science is sophistry…i.e., BS. About Climate of Sophistry. Religion of Climate Change Part 5: Cold Gods don’t create Hot Gods. Ontological Mathematics is the Answer to GHE-Based Climate Alarm →. Climate Change Reconsidered II by Marty Hertzberg. Climate Change Reconsidered II. 8220;While the presence of 0.04 % of CO2 in our atmosphere is essential for life in the biosphere, the notion that such a minor constituent of the atmosphere can control the above forces and motions, is absurd. Ther...I thi...
judithcurry.com
Did the AR5 take the ‘dangerous’ out of AGW? | Climate Etc.
https://judithcurry.com/2013/10/03/did-the-ar5-take-the-dangerous-out-of-agw
Spinning the climate model – observation comparison: Part II. IPCC: fit for its purpose? Did the AR5 take the ‘dangerous’ out of AGW? October 3, 2013. Section 12.5.5 in the WG1 Report provides some important insights on what is most commonly regarded as the ‘dangerous’ aspects of AGW. For background on this topic, see this previous Climate Etc. post Redefining dangerous climate change. I was pointed to section 12.5.5 by a post at BishopHill. The relevant text is below:. Click image for full size). But th...
retiredresearcher.wordpress.com
Quantifying the Anthropogenic Contribution to the Global Background Level of Atmospheric CO2 | Climate Changes
https://retiredresearcher.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/quantifying-the-anthropogenic-contribution-to-the-global-background-level-of-atmospheric-co2
Just another WordPress.com site. Quantifying the Anthropogenic Contribution to the Global Background Level of Atmospheric CO2. November 3, 2011. The Scripps data set from sites that were selected to represent background, http:/ scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric co2.html. Has the longest time coverage for both CO2 and 13CO2 index. Much more data measured around the globe are published at the World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases. The C 13/12 ratio is calculated as:. So what do the Arctic data tell us?
climateofsophistry.com
Fred Singer’s Position Consistent with no Radiative GHE | Climate of Sophistry
https://climateofsophistry.com/2015/05/18/fred-singers-position-consistent-with-no-radiative-ghe
Climate science is sophistry…i.e., BS. About Climate of Sophistry. Ontological Mathematics is the Answer to GHE-Based Climate Alarm. The Ground is not the Surface →. Fred Singer’s Position Consistent with no Radiative GHE. Converging on the Truth. Atmospheric and space physicist Fred Singer published an article. In October of 2014 where he concluded that his position is becoming so skeptical of climate sensitivity claims that he is no longer in agreement with the bulk of the skeptical majority. Climate a...