BLUEDESTINYWINDOW.WORDPRESS.COM

phonology.wordpress.com

March | 2009 | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2009/03

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. The Role of Rules in Speech Production and Perception. By rwojcik on March 3, 2009. Represent psychological strategies that directly govern speaker intentions. Morphophonological Rules represent strategies that alter the string of phonetic targets–usually phonemes of a language–that the speaker intends to produce. Words and morphemes are associated with strings of phonemes in memory. So Rules make reference to morpheme boundaries. They are lexic...Inflectional Rules partic...

phonology.wordpress.com

The Role of Rules in Speech Production and Perception | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/the-role-of-rules-in-speech-production-and-perception

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. The Role of Rules in Speech Production and Perception. By rwojcik on March 3, 2009. Represent psychological strategies that directly govern speaker intentions. Morphophonological Rules represent strategies that alter the string of phonetic targets–usually phonemes of a language–that the speaker intends to produce. Words and morphemes are associated with strings of phonemes in memory. So Rules make reference to morpheme boundaries. They are lexic...Inflectional Rules partic...

phonology.wordpress.com

February | 2009 | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2009/02

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. On the Ontology of Processes. By Rich Rhodes on February 25, 2009. Some twenty years ago, I gave a paper at Krems in which I argued that the processes we see active in particular languages (final devoicing in German and in Turkish, diphthongization in English vowels and in Vietnamese vowels, progressive nasalization in Tucanoan languages and in Ojibwe, etc.) are ontologically distinct from the generalized processes they are created out of. Richard A. Rhodes. In emphasizing...

phonology.wordpress.com

rwojcik | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/author/rwojcik

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. The Role of Rules in Speech Production and Perception. By rwojcik on March 3, 2009. Represent psychological strategies that directly govern speaker intentions. Morphophonological Rules represent strategies that alter the string of phonetic targets–usually phonemes of a language–that the speaker intends to produce. Words and morphemes are associated with strings of phonemes in memory. So Rules make reference to morpheme boundaries. They are lexic...Inflectional Rules partic...

phonology.wordpress.com

What is a phonetic segment? | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/what-is-a-phonetic-segment

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. What is a phonetic segment? By rwojcik on February 12, 2009. Jan Niecislaw Baudouin de Courtenay. In casual speech, pronouncing it more like. Likewise, a speaker might pronounce. In emphatic speech more like. Can sound a lot more like each other in casual speech than when they are carefully articulated. Operations that alter the articulation of a sequence of phonetic segments (or phonemes) that a speaker intends to articulate. From a traditional linguistic perspective, pro...

phonology.wordpress.com

Geoffrey Nathan | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/author/geoffnathan

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. By Geoffrey Nathan on May 29, 2010. I am attempting to scan and convert old NP papers to usable format. Here is the first one, an old Stampe paper on diphthongs. I’ve proofread it pretty well, but the formatting is a little funky because I don’t understand completely how Word does footnotes. If anyone wants to fix it, please do so and let me know. Removed for reformatting and reconsideration. Some puzzles for NP. By Geoffrey Nathan on February 18, 2009. Hurch and Rhodes, e...

phonology.wordpress.com

Rich Rhodes | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/author/richrhodes

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. On the Ontology of Processes. By Rich Rhodes on February 25, 2009. Some twenty years ago, I gave a paper at Krems in which I argued that the processes we see active in particular languages (final devoicing in German and in Turkish, diphthongization in English vowels and in Vietnamese vowels, progressive nasalization in Tucanoan languages and in Ojibwe, etc.) are ontologically distinct from the generalized processes they are created out of. Richard A. Rhodes. In emphasizing...

phonology.wordpress.com

Some puzzles for NP | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/some-puzzles-for-np

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. Some puzzles for NP. By Geoffrey Nathan on February 18, 2009. I’ve been reading in various related areas for several years now, and some researchers outside the NP tradition (or who are actually hostile to it) have some findings that NP theorists need to take account of. I’ll mention some of them here, and it will be interesting to see what folks think. Cohn, Abigail. 1993. “Nasalization in English: Phonology or Phonetics”. Subscribe to comments with RSS. That is, one coul...

phonology.wordpress.com

May | 2010 | Natural Phonology

https://phonology.wordpress.com/2010/05

Skip to search - Accesskey = s. By Geoffrey Nathan on May 29, 2010. I am attempting to scan and convert old NP papers to usable format. Here is the first one, an old Stampe paper on diphthongs. I’ve proofread it pretty well, but the formatting is a little funky because I don’t understand completely how Word does footnotes. If anyone wants to fix it, please do so and let me know. Removed for reformatting and reconsideration. Arnold Zwicky’s Blog. Donegan and Stampe: Hypotheses of Natural Phonology.