digitalagedefense.org
Intermediary liability – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/category/intermediaries
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Questions #16 and #17. It is part and parcel of First Amendment doctrine that people are permitted to speak, and to speak anonymously. Between the self-identification requirements...
digitalagedefense.org
innovation policy – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/tag/innovation-policy
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: Congress protected intermediaries for a reason. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: Congress protected intermediaries for a reason. Congress finds the following: [that t]he rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens[;. That t]he Internet and other...
digitalagedefense.org
DMCA – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/tag/dmca
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Questions #16 and #17. It is part and parcel of First Amendment doctrine that people are permitted to speak, and to speak anonymously. Between the self-identification requirements...
digitalagedefense.org
Cathy Gellis – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/author/cathy
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Questions #16 and #17. It is part and parcel of First Amendment doctrine that people are permitted to speak, and to speak anonymously. Between the self-identification requirements...
digitalagedefense.org
Dancing Babies, The DMCA, Fair Use And Whether Companies Should Pay For Bogus Takedowns (cross-post) – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/2015/07/16/dancing-babies-the-dmca-fair-use-and-whether-companies-should-pay-for-bogus-takedowns-cross-post
Where criminal and technology law meet. Dancing Babies, The DMCA, Fair Use And Whether Companies Should Pay For Bogus Takedowns (cross-post). Earlier this week the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments in the appeal of Lenz v. Universal. This was the case where Stephanie Lenz sued Universal. And speech- chilling mess. 8221; (emphasis added). EFF, arguing for Lenz, disagreed, however, arguing that the articulation of fair use in the statute, at 17 U.S.C. 107. Posted by Cathy Gellis. On July 16, 2015. Trackin...
digitalagedefense.org
Criminal IP Enforcement – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/category/ip
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: On the general effectiveness of the Safe Harbors. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: On the general effectiveness of the Safe Harbors. Asks whether Section 512 safe harbors are working as intended, and Question #5. Relatedly, Question #2. Outlining the requirements for safe harbors they can rarely be so confidently assured. Continue reading ». Posted by Cathy Gellis. On April 6, 2016. Tagged with: 47 USC Section 230. Veoh wa...
digitalagedefense.org
domain names – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/tag/domain-names
Where criminal and technology law meet. What Charles Carreon could teach ICANN (cross-post). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on What Charles Carreon could teach ICANN (cross-post). The following is cross-posted from Popehat. There is no question that the right of free speech necessarily includes the right to speak anonymously. This is partly because sometimes the only way for certain speech to be possible at all is with the protection of anonymity. Continue reading ». Posted by Cathy Gellis.
digitalagedefense.org
Analysis/commentary – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/category/analysis
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Questions #16 and #17. It is part and parcel of First Amendment doctrine that people are permitted to speak, and to speak anonymously. Between the self-identification requirements...
digitalagedefense.org
How Section 1201 of the copyright statute threatens innovation – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/2015/07/02/how-section-1201-of-the-copyright-statute-threatens-innovation
Where criminal and technology law meet. In the triennial rulemaking underway members of the public petitioned for a number of exemptions. In ways they had the legitimate right to use them. Because particularly for the classes seeking exemptions to modify the functionality of, or perform security research on, devices like phones (Classes 11 and 16), tablets (Class 12), TVs (Class 20), vehicles (Classes 21 and 22), and even computer-chipped medical devices. Thanks to Jeffrey Vagle. Posted by Cathy Gellis.
digitalagedefense.org
Regulating speech – Digital Age Defense
http://www.digitalagedefense.org/wp/category/regulating-speech
Where criminal and technology law meet. Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Privacy from private parties. Comments Off on Comments on DMCA Section 512: First Amendment issues with counter-notifications and repeat infringer policies (and more). Questions #16 and #17. It is part and parcel of First Amendment doctrine that people are permitted to speak, and to speak anonymously. Between the self-identification requirements...
