atheodicy.wordpress.com
atheology: a blog about nothing | Page 2
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/page/2
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Newer posts →. June 7, 2015. Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Is a nice little collection of papers on the cross-fertilization (and mutual illumination) of Buddhist thought and analytic philosophy. In recent years I’ve been interested in the concept of emptiness. My goal has been to avoid dialetheic interpretations of the emptiness of emptiness, and if possible maintain a classical interpretation. A thing without any properties would have the pr...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
follow up on paradox and totality | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2016/07/02/follow-up-on-paradox-and-totality
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Note on heller and cogburn’s meillassoux paper. Hegel and nothing →. Follow up on paradox and totality. July 2, 2016. Of course I readily agree that neither wilful ignorance nor complacent dismissal are acceptable responses to the paradoxes of totality. In fact it is basically axiomatic for me that dogmatic quietism is off the table: something significant, something revisionary, must be done. I take it to be true, furthermore, that there are no straight. This leads to a p...
disquietism.wordpress.com
April 2016 – disquietism
https://disquietism.wordpress.com/2016/04
April 8, 2016. April 16, 2016. April 6, 2016. April 15, 2016. Jon Cogburn's Blog. Atheology: a blog about nothing. PHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERROR. An und für sich. Terrain.org: A Journal of the Built Natural Environments. Blog at WordPress.com. Thoughts from an existential type. Ruins of the buddhist real. Spinozism and Life in the Chaosmos. Researcher, lecturer and author in Contemporary European Thought: Atheism and Religion. No bells, just whistling in the dark. Just another WordPress.com site.
disquietism.wordpress.com
DISQUIETISM – disquietism
https://disquietism.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/disquietism
April 6, 2016. April 15, 2016. Wilfred Sellars once wrote that:. The solutions are inventions because the problems are invented; the problems are invented because only inventions can be solved. Thinking, doubly neutered, becomes the cure. To its own diseases. It cannot. Because it can only. The putative, anaemic self-reflexivity of philosophy, as reported by the quietist, does not damn it to the onanism of mere self-medication or ludic play; rather, philosophy’s. Of utmost efficacy in the world. 8216;We ...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
more on waghorn | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2016/06/11/more-on-waghorn
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Note on heller and cogburn’s meillassoux paper →. June 11, 2016. Just a little more to add to my previous post. Consider the following argument:. Set theoretical paradoxes such as Russell’s paradox show that we can’t consistently quantify over absolutely everything. If we had a consistent concept of absolutely everything, then we could consistently quantify over absolutely everything. We don’t have a consistent concept of absolutely everything (from 1 and 2). We can disti...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
note on heller and cogburn’s meillassoux paper | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/note-on-cogburn-and-hellers-meillassoux-paper
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Follow up on paradox and totality →. Note on heller and cogburn’s meillassoux paper. June 29, 2016. Meillassoux’s insistence on. This ignorance [of whether the possible can be totalized] suffices to expose the illegitimacy of extending aleatory reasoning beyond a totality that is already given in experience. Since we cannot decide a priori. What is important to note here is that aleatory reasoning applies legitimately to experience for Meillassoux, which forms a totality,...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
global anti-representationalism and ‘the world’ | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2015/06/13/global-anti-representationalism-and-the-world
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Two new papers… →. Global anti-representationalism and ‘the world’. June 13, 2015. Huw Price distinguishes between. Naturalism as follows. Object naturalism is the view that all that exists is. Price calls his own view subject naturalism (amongst other names), and takes it to be prior to and independent of object naturalism. Subject naturalism is initially described simply as the view that we ought to start with ourselves. Notice that Price’s starting point is the p...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
may update… | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2016/05/28/may-update
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Two new papers…. More on waghorn →. May 28, 2016. At present this blog is as acting as a sort of placeholder for future input, so for those of you who are still following, please bear with me! At the moment I am working a heavy teaching load, which doesn’t leave much time for independent study or writing; and in any case my ideas are even without external interference slow to develop. Nevertheless, I recently had a chance to read through Nicholas Waghorn’s. To which we ca...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
kant, spinoza, and a little hume | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/kant-spinoza-hume/comment-page-1
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Quote of the day →. Kant, spinoza, and a little hume. June 13, 2013. One of the virtues of Paul W. Franks book. Is that it explores the metaphysical and epistemological aspects of the Agrippan trilemma at the same time. To escape the latter for a series X. 8211; supposing we accept the. To escape – we must identify the ground of X. Which allows the series to terminate. This leads to what Franks calls the heterogeneity requirement,. 8211; let’s call it Y. The threat of dua...
atheodicy.wordpress.com
hegel and nothing | atheology: a blog about nothing
https://atheodicy.wordpress.com/2016/12/26/hegel-and-nothing
Atheology: a blog about nothing. Follow up on paradox and totality. December 26, 2016. Pure being is so indeterminate that it is not even being and so is nothing. This is the basic Hegelian idea at the beginning of the. Supposing we do this, what is left of the concept of pure being? The interchangeably of pure being and nothing is strictly symmetrical. This entry was posted in cartesian dreaming. Follow up on paradox and totality. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Enter your comment here. Quote of the day.
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT