travismitchellbarrister.com
Thank you | Equity, Trusts and More
https://travismitchellbarrister.com/2014/10/29/thank-you
Equity, Trusts and More. Travis Mitchell, Barrister at the Victorian Bar. October 29, 2014. Middot; by travismitchell. Thank you to all of my supporters who helped me to raise $5,000 for Bowel Cancer Australia. I was a long way from the fastest finisher but I did complete the marathon. Your generous support helped to push me to the finish. This entry was posted in Equitable Principles. Equitable claim against a trustee in bankruptcy transferred to the Federal Court. Lost trust deeds ». Blog at WordPress&...
travismitchellbarrister.com
Marathon for Bowel Cancer Australia | Equity, Trusts and More
https://travismitchellbarrister.com/2014/08/11/marathon-for-bowel-cancer-australia
Equity, Trusts and More. Travis Mitchell, Barrister at the Victorian Bar. Marathon for Bowel Cancer Australia. August 11, 2014. Middot; by travismitchell. You may have noticed I haven’t posted much to this blog lately. In part that’s because I’ve been spending a lot of time outside enjoying Melbourne’s beautiful winter weather (hail, anyone? Training for a marathon I’m running in October. I’ll be running 42.195km on October 12. Are you with me? Any donation is very gratefully received. Oh nice post ....
travismitchellbarrister.com
Small Business | Equity, Trusts and More
https://travismitchellbarrister.com/tag/small-business
Equity, Trusts and More. Travis Mitchell, Barrister at the Victorian Bar. Tag Archives: Small Business. A how-to guide for small business break-ups. November 29, 2013. Middot; by travismitchell. Equity in Corporations matters. CPDS Seminar: When Small Business Relationships Go Sour. November 1, 2013. Middot; by travismitchell. Equity in Corporations matters. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation. To search all blog posts…. Equity in Corporations matters (6).
travismitchellbarrister.com
Proprietary Estoppel and Reliance – Sidhu v Van Dyke | Equity, Trusts and More
https://travismitchellbarrister.com/2014/05/20/proprietary-estoppel-and-reliance-sidhu-v-van-dyke
Equity, Trusts and More. Travis Mitchell, Barrister at the Victorian Bar. Proprietary Estoppel and Reliance – Sidhu v Van Dyke. May 20, 2014. Middot; by travismitchell. My colleague Robert Hay has posted a useful note on the High Court’s recent decision on proprietary estoppel in. Sidhu v Van Dyke. You can read Robert’s post on the Property Law Blog here. This entry was posted in Equitable Principles. A how-to guide for small business break-ups. Marathon for Bowel Cancer Australia ». Follow Blog by Email.
roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com
Landlord cannot recover essential safety measure costs or the costs of complying with s.52 of Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) | The Property Law Blog
https://roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/landlord-cannot-recover-essential-safety-measure-costs-or-the-costs-of-complying-with-s-52-of-retail-leases-act-2003-vic
Robert Hay QC Property and Commercial Law Barrister. The Property Law Blog. Laquo; “Profits method” of rental valuation does not breach s.37 of Retail Leases Act 2003. Landlords likely to consider gross leases. Landlord cannot recover essential safety measure costs or the costs of complying with s.52 of Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). T 1993 ( BA. And its regulations. Nor can a landlord require a tenant to pay as an outgoing the costs that the landlord has incurred in complying with s.52 of the. B) a requi...
roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com
Wife’s title as joint proprietor with husband not defeasible by reason of husband’s fraud | The Property Law Blog
https://roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/wifes-title-as-joint-proprietor-with-husband-not-defeasible-by-reason-of-husbands-fraud
Robert Hay QC Property and Commercial Law Barrister. The Property Law Blog. Laquo; Tenants should dispute rent nominated by landlord within time period specified in the lease. 8220;Profits method” of rental valuation does not breach s.37 of Retail Leases Act 2003. Wife’s title as joint proprietor with husband not defeasible by reason of husband’s fraud. Section 42(1) of the. 1900 (NSW) provides that the estate of a registered proprietor is paramount. It provides that, subject to some exceptions:. Proceed...
commbarmatters.com
agreement – CommBar Matters
http://commbarmatters.com/tag/agreement
Return to CommBar (Main Website). Commentary and case law from the Commercial Bar Association's finest. Middot; May 5, 2015 · by Glen Pauline. Mediation: Can a handshake settle the dispute? Handshake agreement did not waive or vary requirement in Mediation Agreement for a signed settlement agreement. Building and Construction Law. Competition and Consumer Law. Corporations and Securities Law. Insurance and Professional Negligence. IP and Trade Practices. 17 Aug, 2016. 17 Aug, 2016. 17 Aug, 2016. 8230;] D...
commbarmatters.com
Deficiency in will execution procedure – CommBar Matters
http://commbarmatters.com/2015/05/12/deficiency-in-will-execution-procedure
Return to CommBar (Main Website). Commentary and case law from the Commercial Bar Association's finest. Deficiency in will execution procedure. Middot; May 12, 2015 · by James D Catlin. VEALL v VEALL [2015] VSCA 60. Important decision on the requirements of setting aside a will on the grounds that the testator did not know or approve of the contents. Useful study of suspicious circumstances necessary to displace the presumption of knowledge and approval created by due execution of a will. Fact that a wil...
commbarmatters.com
Mediation: Can a handshake settle the dispute? – CommBar Matters
http://commbarmatters.com/2015/05/05/mediation-can-a-handshake-settle-the-dispute
Return to CommBar (Main Website). Commentary and case law from the Commercial Bar Association's finest. Mediation: Can a handshake settle the dispute? Middot; May 5, 2015 · by Glen Pauline. Rilgar Nominees Pty Ltd v BHA Holdings Pty Ltd. 2014] VSC 632 and [2015] VSC 6. Handshake agreement did not waive or vary requirement in Mediation Agreement for a signed settlement agreement. The case illustrates three important issues for mediators, parties and their representatives. Was of no application. The Bo...
