lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: Judges are Whores
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2013/10/judges-are-whores.html
Thursday, October 24, 2013. There is a rule of law which permits two different offences to be joined in a single trial if they are " connected in their commission. 2004) 32 Cal.4th 73, in which the " California Supremes. Held that it was proper to join a charged escape with a murder alleged to have occurred two years before,. The issue, under the plain meaning of the statue, is not whether two offences are "connected" in some causal abstraction but whether they were connected in their commission. -.
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: A Judicial DIME Bomb
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2009/03/judicial-dime-bomb.html
Saturday, March 7, 2009. A Judicial DIME Bomb. Using a sealed warrant. Police searched defendant's home and seized small amounts of drugs. Upon being charged, defendant brought a motion in the magistrate's court. To traverse and suppress. The warrant. After the motion was denied, defendant pled guilty, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. Of the proceedings prior to conviction he or she has moved for . the suppression of the evidence.". 1997) 16 Cal.4th 1210, 1215). 4 Under...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: February 2009
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html
Wednesday, February 18, 2009. Checko, Excited Chickens and a Portuguese Gentleman. Anna B. testified that she knew defendant by his nickname "Checko". She had been to Dominic's Bar that evening but was still inside when the stabbing occurred. When she came outside the incident was over but she heard unidentified people saying that "Checko did it". At trial over defense objection, the prosecution was allowed to introduce the hearsay. Prohibits testimony that repeats what somebody else said outside of cour...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: October 2013
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2013_10_01_archive.html
Thursday, October 24, 2013. There is a rule of law which permits two different offences to be joined in a single trial if they are " connected in their commission. 2004) 32 Cal.4th 73, in which the " California Supremes. Held that it was proper to join a charged escape with a murder alleged to have occurred two years before,. The issue, under the plain meaning of the statue, is not whether two offences are "connected" in some causal abstraction but whether they were connected in their commission. -.
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: Harmless Injustice
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2013/11/harmless-injustice.html
Monday, November 4, 2013. On appeal, Rice contended that the detective's opinion as to what the video showed was prejudicially improper evidence and that, once his opinion was removed from the balance, there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilt. Rice also contended that the trial court had failed to instruct the jury that the testimony of an accomplice required some independent corroboration before it could be relied upon to establish guilt. Subd (a); People v. Harvey. Also by...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: Sealed Warrant
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2000/01/sealed-warrant.html
Saturday, January 1, 2000. Is a warrant that is based on secret sworn statements made to a magistrate in closed proceedings and never disclosed to the defendant. Provides that searches and seizures must be authorized by a judicially issued warrant and that the warrant must be based on probable cause to believe that specified items will be found in the place to be searched. Probable cause is based on sworn statements in what is called the warrant's " supporting affidavit. However, where a warrant is "seal...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: September 2009
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html
Monday, September 7, 2009. The Right to be Free from Intimidating Searches and Seizures". According to Dickerson, he did not block defendant's car. The judge believed Dickerson's version of the events, and so it is to be assumed on appeal that defendant was physically. Unembarrassed from throwing his car into reverse and driving off. Should the evidence of defendant's methamphatine usage be suppressed as the " poisoned fruit. Of an unlawful search and seizure? The driver of a motor vehicle to present his...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: March 2009
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html
Saturday, March 7, 2009. A Judicial DIME Bomb. Using a sealed warrant. Police searched defendant's home and seized small amounts of drugs. Upon being charged, defendant brought a motion in the magistrate's court. To traverse and suppress. The warrant. After the motion was denied, defendant pled guilty, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. Of the proceedings prior to conviction he or she has moved for . the suppression of the evidence.". 1997) 16 Cal.4th 1210, 1215). 4 Under...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: January 2000
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2000_01_01_archive.html
Saturday, January 1, 2000. Is a warrant that is based on secret sworn statements made to a magistrate in closed proceedings and never disclosed to the defendant. Provides that searches and seizures must be authorized by a judicially issued warrant and that the warrant must be based on probable cause to believe that specified items will be found in the place to be searched. Probable cause is based on sworn statements in what is called the warrant's " supporting affidavit. However, where a warrant is "seal...
lexcrescence.blogspot.com
LEXCRESCENCE: February 2015
http://lexcrescence.blogspot.com/2015_02_01_archive.html
Tuesday, February 10, 2015. Blah blah balh balh. Subscribe to: Posts (Atom). View my complete profile.
