debatescholarship.wordpress.com
The Debate Estuary | Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working GroupWorksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group
http://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group
http://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/
TODAY'S RATING
>1,000,000
Date Range
HIGHEST TRAFFIC ON
Thursday
LOAD TIME
3 seconds
16x16
32x32
PAGES IN
THIS WEBSITE
4
SSL
EXTERNAL LINKS
14
SITE IP
192.0.78.13
LOAD TIME
2.985 sec
SCORE
6.2
The Debate Estuary | Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group | debatescholarship.wordpress.com Reviews
https://debatescholarship.wordpress.com
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group
debatescholarship.wordpress.com
June | 2009 | The Debate Estuary
https://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/2009/06
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group. Archive for June, 2009. Debate and Collaborative Research. June 4, 2009. Research area brainstorming and agenda setting, including roundtable discussion to project the upcoming year’s academic projects and set research priorities (correlates with debate team research assignment brainstorming). RESOLVED: “That the nonagricultural industries should guarantee their employees an annual wage” (1955-1956). RESOLVED: “That the fed...
Working Group Tasks, Aims and Schedule | The Debate Estuary
https://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/hello-world
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group. Working Group Tasks, Aims and Schedule. The purpose of this working group is to foster research and scholarship by examining the culture and prevailing norms among debate professionals toward research and scholarship, identify opportunities for innovation in scholarship, examine existing outlets and imagine new possibilities for research and scholarship about debate and/or by debaters. Friday, June 5, 9:00 pm – 9:30 pm.
Policy Debate Brief Series | The Debate Estuary
https://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/policy-debate-brief-series
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group. Policy Debate Brief Series. Our sister Working Group on Tenure and Promotion has circulated a fantastic draft document. And invited comment. An important recommendation appears at the mid-point of the document (no pagination):. The Policy Debate Brief series project is still in its evolutionary phase, with details to be refined, and the overall project direction to be considered, during the upcoming NDC later this month. Howe...
About this Worksite | The Debate Estuary
https://debatescholarship.wordpress.com/about
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group. In the natural world, some of the most vibrant and amazing acquatic life forms thrive in estuaries. Pete Bsumek, James Madison University. Chris Lundberg, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Matt Stannard, University of Wyoming. Jeff Richards, Sammamish HS, Bellevue, WA. Ben Voth, Southern Methodist University. Michael Mangus, University of Pittsburgh. Michael Jensen, National Academy of Sciences (Advisory member).
TOTAL PAGES IN THIS WEBSITE
4
A Numbers Game: April 2009
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009_04_01_archive.html
Open source debate statistics. Wednesday, April 29, 2009. Using Jon Bruschke's databases on debateresults.com. I have calculated some historical judge side bias. For instance, for the 2006-2007 season (the courts topic), the aff won 50.10% of all ballots. The judges below are those most likely to differ from the general judge population that year:. Joe Koehle, Aff:56, Neg:30. Kirk Evans, Aff:26, Neg:10. Austin Carson, Aff:10, Neg:1. Joe Patrice, Aff:22, Neg:45. Greta Stahl, Aff:26, Neg:50.
A Numbers Game: September 2009
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009_09_01_archive.html
Open source debate statistics. Friday, September 11, 2009. Every summer there is discussion about the side bias of prospective controversy areas and resolutions. Using the data from DebateResults.com. We can see what side bias past resolutions have exhibited. Under the Bradley-Terry model, the energy, China, and security guarantee topics had small, yet highly statistically significant (. Negative bias. The other three topics show no statistically significant bias either way. Links to this post.
A Numbers Game: The Ross K. Smith scale and standards
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/10/ross-k-smith-scale-and-standards.html
Open source debate statistics. Sunday, October 11, 2009. The Ross K. Smith scale and standards. Click here for more on speaker point scale changes. In a post on edebate. Brian DeLong suggests that tournaments adopting the 100-point (RKS) scale provide an interpretation of the scale to judges to make sure points are allocated fairly. His motivation is based partially on a discrepancy he saw between judges in the Kentucky results from this year. Alex Lamballe gave an average of 90.83 points, but other ...
A Numbers Game: Changing the speaker point scale
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/07/changing-speaker-point-scale.html
Open source debate statistics. Thursday, July 23, 2009. Changing the speaker point scale. The Georgia State tournament is moving to a 100-point speaker point scale next year. This will make them the third large [ N.B. Tournament to use a non-standard scale. I have put up some charts of how changing the scale affected point distributions at Wake and USC. Are any other tournament directors planning on switching point scales? If you considered doing so, but decided not to, what stopped you? Looking for rese...
A Numbers Game: November 2009
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009_11_01_archive.html
Open source debate statistics. Sunday, November 8, 2009. RKS scale not dramatically increasing predictive accuracy. Wake Forest, 8 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. UNLV open division, 7 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. Harvard, 8 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. Links to this post. Wednesday, November 4, 2009. RKS translation at Harvard. The Harvard tournament this year had a very explicit and very simple translation. We can see how the judging pool interpreted the RKS scale:. Shows that a me...
A Numbers Game: Update on speaker point scales
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/07/update-on-speaker-point-scales.html
Open source debate statistics. Tuesday, July 28, 2009. Update on speaker point scales. In response to a question from cross-x.com. I checked to see if the point distributions are any smoother for teams that might clear. It turns out that they aren't. Except to the extent that the distributions have a narrower range:. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom). Update on speaker point scales. Changing the speaker point scale. Subscribe To A Numbers Game. Related Blogs and Wikis. Judge Philosophies Recent Changes.
A Numbers Game: RKS scale not dramatically increasing predictive accuracy
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/11/rks-scale-not-dramatically-increasing.html
Open source debate statistics. Sunday, November 8, 2009. RKS scale not dramatically increasing predictive accuracy. Wake Forest, 8 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. UNLV open division, 7 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. Harvard, 8 prelims. Tied points, no prediction. Saturday, May 08, 2010 7:07:00 PM. You should do a piece on speaker points for my new debate journal. Http:/ www.the3nr.com/2010/05/05/the-last-word-a-new-debate-journal/. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom). RKS translation at Harvard.
A Numbers Game: RKS translation at Harvard
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/11/rks-translation-at-harvard.html
Open source debate statistics. Wednesday, November 4, 2009. RKS translation at Harvard. The Harvard tournament this year had a very explicit and very simple translation. From the 30-point scale to the 100-point (or Ross K. Smith) scale. Using the results packet. We can see how the judging pool interpreted the RKS scale:. It will be interesting to see how many judges circled the indicator. On the front of their ballots indicating that they were conforming to the suggested scale translation. Home: http:/ w...
A Numbers Game: Topic side bias
http://blog.anumbersgame.net/2009/09/topic-side-bias.html
Open source debate statistics. Friday, September 11, 2009. Every summer there is discussion about the side bias of prospective controversy areas and resolutions. Using the data from DebateResults.com. We can see what side bias past resolutions have exhibited. Under the Bradley-Terry model, the energy, China, and security guarantee topics had small, yet highly statistically significant (. Negative bias. The other three topics show no statistically significant bias either way. Subscribe To A Numbers Game.
TOTAL LINKS TO THIS WEBSITE
14
debatesantropologicos.blogspot.com
Discussões Antropológicas
Para debater opiniões sobre antropologia e sociologia sem um compromisso acadêmico. Terça-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2010. Afinal de contas quem escreveu a Bíblia? 8220;Você só pode estar brincando! O que estou buscando aqui é então levar em consideração o que os nativos têm a dizer sobre quem foi que escreveu a Bíblia, foi Deus ou foram os homens? Se me permitem utilizar termos mais próprios à disciplina, refaço a pergunta da seguinte forma: a Palavra de Deus é transcendente ou imanente? Os cristãos que es...
Debate Saúde | Projetos Inovadores de Educação e Promoção da Saúde
Projetos Inovadores de Educação e Promoção da Saúde. Saltar para o conteúdo. Estratégias inovadoras de educação para saúde. 14 de Fevereiro de 2013. 1 de Julho de 2016. Deixe o seu comentário. Projetos inovadores de educação em saúde, produção de vídeos, materiais informativos, pesquisas científicas com pacientes e profissionais de saúde. Endereço: Rua André Casado, 275 – Bairro: Sumaré / CEP: 01259-040. 8220;Dificuldades e obstáculos são fontes valiosas de saúde e força para qualquer sociedade” (.
Debates BDSM | La Web de Debates BDSM de la sala de Chat #dolor_y_placer
La Web de Debates BDSM de la sala de Chat #dolor y placer. Ir al contenido principal. DebatesBdsm la web de debates de Doloryplacer.org. Bienvenidos al Blog de los Debates BDSM. Os damos la Bienvenida a nuestro Blog de los Debates. BDSM que realizamos todos los jueves en la sala #dolor y placer del servidor de chat de ChatZona. Podrás acceder a ellos en directo y podrás participar desde nuestra web entrando a las salas de Chat. Entra al Chat BDSM. Un saludo a todos. Escúchanos desde tu escritorio.
debatescentral.com - This website is for sale! - debates Resources and Information.
The owner of debatescentral.com. Is offering it for sale for an asking price of 5000 USD! This webpage was generated by the domain owner using Sedo Domain Parking. Disclaimer: Sedo maintains no relationship with third party advertisers. Reference to any specific service or trade mark is not controlled by Sedo nor does it constitute or imply its association, endorsement or recommendation.
debatescholarship.wordpress.com
The Debate Estuary | Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group
Worksite for the 2009 Debate Summit Research and Scholarship Working Group. Debate and Collaborative Research. June 4, 2009 - One Response. Research area brainstorming and agenda setting, including roundtable discussion to project the upcoming year’s academic projects and set research priorities (correlates with debate team research assignment brainstorming). RESOLVED: “That the nonagricultural industries should guarantee their employees an annual wage” (1955-1956). RESOLVED: “That the federal gove...
www.debateschool.com
This page requires that your browser supports frames. You can access the page without frames with this link.
한국청소년문화진흥협회..
과거 홈페이지에서 가입하신 분들께서는 031-872-4609로 연락하시면 비밀번호를 확인하실 수 있습니다. 제8회 환경정화봉사 전국청소년실천대회 . 제8회 환경정화봉사 전국청소년실천대회 . 제8회 환경정화봉사 전국청소년실천대회 . 11677 경기도 의정부시 신촌로 71-1, 3층 (가능동) tel. 031-872-4609 fax. 031-872-4607.
Debate School of New Jersey (201) 286-0154 - Home
Debate School of New Jersey (201) 286-0154. Debate Program for Senior Citizens. Debate Program for Law Firms and Corporate Law Departments. Your child will learn to debate at. Debate School of New Jersey, LLC. Strengthen the power of persuasion. Enroll Today. Give us a call at (201) 286-0154. This program fosters the development of critical thinking, argumentation, organizational and listening skills in children in 2nd through 8th grades. Debate sessions are 45 minutes in length. Mahwah, NJ 07495.
Debate Escolar | Innovación pedagógica a través del debate
Debate en el currículum. Pequeñas Ideas para grandes Historias. LIGA DEBATE 4º ESO. Formulario de inscripción liga debate escolar. Concurso Escolar de Oratoria. III Concurso Escolar de Oratoria. Formulario Inscripción III Edición Concurso Oratoria. Application form for the Public Speaking Contest. Torneo Interprovincial Debate Escolar. Debate en el currículum. Pequeñas Ideas para grandes Historias. LIGA DEBATE 4º ESO. Formulario de inscripción liga debate escolar. Concurso Escolar de Oratoria. Mayo 07,20...
