internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: October 2014
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2014_10_01_archive.html
Wednesday, October 08, 2014. International Prenuptial Agreements: Necessary But Dangerous. Lawyers representing international clients who plan to marry and who want the protection of a prenuptial agreement should always consider the international ramifications of any proposed agreement. While conventional domestic prenuptial agreements raise grave malpractice concerns for family lawyers, the concerns become a hazardous minefield when the issues are multi-jurisdictional. Or an international movie star?
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: June 2015
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015_06_01_archive.html
Friday, June 19, 2015. Ineffective Access Rights in Japan under Hague Abduction Convention. Jeremy D. Morley. There is great misunderstanding about the ability of a parent outside Japan to obtain access to a child in Japan through the Hague Abduction Convention. Essentially what all of this means is that no Hague Convention access application can be made in Japan if the child is habitually resident in Japan at the time the alleged right of access has been violated. This is confirmed by the Japanese Minis...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: November 2014
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2014_11_01_archive.html
Wednesday, November 26, 2014. Mature Child’s Objections in Hague Cases. Jeremy D. Morley. The mature child’s objection exception to the Hague Abduction Convention employs very loose language that provides a trial court with great discretion. In sharp contrast, a New Jersey federal judge ruled last month that the exception would not apply to two children, aged 15 and 12, both of whom stated that they would prefer to remain in the United States. De La Vera v. Holguin. Subscribe to: Posts (Atom). My Interna...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: Preventing Child Visits to India
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015/07/preventing-child-visits-to-india.html
Wednesday, July 29, 2015. Preventing Child Visits to India. Jeremy D. Morley. Having represented numerous clients in international child custody matters concerning India, this author has been accepted on several occasions as an expert on international family law matters concerning India. The author is aware of seven cases in which courts in the United States, Canada and England have refused to allow visits to India because India has no system for returning internationally abducted children. 8, 2013. ...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: July 2015
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015_07_01_archive.html
Thursday, July 30, 2015. 8220;Our cup runneth over” with amazing testimonials from our clients. Here is just one:. For more, check out http:/ www.international-divorce.com/testimonials.htm. Wednesday, July 29, 2015. Preventing Child Visits to India. Jeremy D. Morley. Having represented numerous clients in international child custody matters concerning India, this author has been accepted on several occasions as an expert on international family law matters concerning India. The cases are as follows:.
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: May 2015
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015_05_01_archive.html
Thursday, May 21, 2015. Forced Prenuptial Agreements: Australian Cases. Jeremy D. Morley. Courts around the world generally reserve the right to invalidate prenuptial agreements that were entered into under duress. The meaning of “duress” can be extremely hard to determine in specific cases. Can there be duress when a young impecunious foreign woman moves to another country to marry a rich man who then demands that she sign a “take it or leave it” prenuptial agreement? The woman consulted a lawyer but he...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: December 2014
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2014_12_01_archive.html
Tuesday, December 23, 2014. Will the Supreme Court Resolve the Meaning of Habitual Residence? Jeremy D. Morley. Tom Wolfrum and I have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in the 9. Circuit case of Murphy v. Sloan for a writ of certiorari on the issue of the interpretation of habitual residence in a Hague Abduction Convention case. The petition may be accessed through Westlaw at 2014 WL 6737443. The essence of our petition is as follows:. Moreover, the U.S. majority interpretation is clouded with un...Ii) R...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: August 2014
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2014_08_01_archive.html
Friday, August 29, 2014. Prenuptial Agreements in Japan. We have represented many international clients who have entered into marriage contracts or prenuptial agreements with Japanese spouses. We always work in collaboration with Japanese counsel in such matters as appropriate and as instructed by our clients. Prenuptial agreements are not common in Japan. They have never been a part of Japanese culture, even for the upper classes. In Japan, Article 26 of the Act on the General Rules of Application of La...
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: Testimonials
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015/07/testimonials.html
Thursday, July 30, 2015. 8220;Our cup runneth over” with amazing testimonials from our clients. Here is just one:. For more, check out http:/ www.international-divorce.com/testimonials.htm. Twitter: Jeremy D. Morley. My Book: International Family Law Practice. My Primary Site: International Family Law Office. My International Prenuptial Agreements Website. Hague Convention Abduction Cases: How to Win. View my complete profile. Preventing Child Visits to India. Plight of the Expatriate Spouse.
internationalfamilylawfirm.com
International Family Law: April 2015
http://www.internationalfamilylawfirm.com/2015_04_01_archive.html
Tuesday, April 28, 2015. Jeremy D. Morley [1]. Swedish courts have divorce jurisdiction as provided in the European Union's Brussels II bis regulation, if:. A Both spouses are habitually resident in Sweden; or. B Both spouses were last habitually resident in Sweden, and one still resides there; or. C The defendant is habitually resident in Sweden; or. D The plaintiff is habitually resident in Sweden, and either has resided there for at least a year preceding the application or is a Swedish national; or.
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT