futureofscipub.wordpress.com
Peer review debate in London | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/peer-review-debate-in-london
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Peer review debate in London. Although most of the speakers were from the industry, Sylvia Tippmann. And the other organisers from the Science Journalism programme at City University, London invited two scientists, Peter Ayton and myself. Here’s the video. Of the debate and here’s an 3-minute interview. They did with me afterwards. Feed You can leave a response. From your own site.
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
Q: Why are there so few post-publication comments in PLoS ONE? | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/q-why-are-there-so-few-post-publication-comments-in-plos-one
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Q: Why are there so few post-publication comments in PLoS ONE? PLoS ONE is a lower-tier journal. Most scientists have a backlog of potentially highly important papers to catch up on. It is, thus, to be expected that most papers will get few reviews. Just as is the case now for PLoS ONE. An additional mechanism for the new system is that of author-solicited reviews. This would wo...
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
Open post-publication peer review (full argument) | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/open-post-publication-peer-review-full-argument
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Open post-publication peer review (full argument). 1) Drawbacks of the current system of scientific publishing. Not generally open access. Scientific papers benefit society only to the extent that they are accessible. If the public pays for scientific research it should demand that the results be openly accessible. Impoverished evaluative signal for choosing papers. Scientific publi...
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/an-emerging-consensus-for-open-evaluation-18-visions-for-the-future-of-scientific-publishing
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing. Diana Deca and I edited a collection of 18 visions for open evaluation and the future of scientific publishing. Our Editorial summarising the whole collection is here. The 18 individual papers are here. Including my own vision. Feed You can leave a response. From your own site. Hi Although...
nature.com
Technical solutions: Wisdom of the crowds
http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04992.html
Jump to main content. Technical solutions: Wisdom of the crowds. Scientific publishers should let their online readers become reviewers. Who are the peers in peer review? In journals such as Nature. Two types of 'peer'? Are these two different uses of 'peer' – in science, a professor; online, anyone – just a case of sloppy semantics, or could the wisdom of online crowds be a model for scientific review? And more 'Is it right for the readers of journal X? Online, plenty of websites let their readers decid...
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
Open post-publication peer review (brief argument) | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/open-post-publication-peer-review-brief-argument
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Open post-publication peer review (brief argument). The first step toward change is to imagine an alternative. This is a synoptic version of a more extended argument presented here. The current system of scientific publishing. Recent positive developments in scientific publishing include the Public Library of Science ( PLoS. And other open-access journals, the Frontiers journals.
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
About this blog | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/about
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. OA) is one essential element. There is wide agreement about the desirability of open access to the scientific literature. 2) Open post-publication peer review. Please feel free to comment or email ( nikokriegeskorte@gmail.com. If you have related ideas, concerns, feedback, or pointers to relevant developments. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Enter your comment here. Open post-publicatio...
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
The future of scientific publishing | ideas for an open, transparent, independent system | Page 2
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/page/2
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Q: How can scientists be motivated to submit reviews in an open peer review system? February 13, 2009. Scientists accept requests to review papers in the current system this will not change. The motivation to review a paper is greater if the review is an open letter to the community. The fact that reviews are public makes reviewing a more meaningful and motivating activity. Once an ...
futureofscipub.wordpress.com
Scientist meets publisher, Episode 1: Open access | The future of scientific publishing
https://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/scientist-meets-publisher-episode-1-open-access
The future of scientific publishing. Ideas for an open, transparent, independent system. Open post-publication peer review. Scientist meets publisher, Episode 1: Open access. This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 12th, 2013 at 6:48 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Feed You can leave a response. From your own site. Laquo; Previous Post. Next Post ». Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Enter your comment here. Address never made public).