derechocompetencia.blogspot.com
COMPETENCIA Y REGULACIÓN : septiembre 2016
http://derechocompetencia.blogspot.com/2016_09_01_archive.html
8220;Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom” (F.A. Hayek). Lunes, 26 de septiembre de 2016. La posible reforma de la CNMC (II): el diseño institucional y las funciones de la autoridad de competencia. Me ocuparé en ésta del segundo. 160;La estructura y funciones de las autoridades de competencia han sido objeto de una creciente atención durante los últimos años no sólo por parte de. Sino también de distintos. 8220;amalgama no debe conducir a un ...
derechocompetencia.blogspot.com
COMPETENCIA Y REGULACIÓN : Feliz Navidad
http://derechocompetencia.blogspot.com/2016/12/feliz-navidad.html
8220;Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom” (F.A. Hayek). Sábado, 24 de diciembre de 2016. FELIZ NAVIDAD Y AÑO 2017. Enviar por correo electrónico. Publicar un comentario en la entrada. Suscribirse a: Enviar comentarios (Atom). Crimen y castigo en el Derecho de la competencia: . DIA/EROSKI y las alianzas compradoras, segunda par. El caso de los taxistas contra UBER, ante el Tribu. Judgment in NOS v PT (antitrust damages arising fr. Elena F Pér...
derechocompetencia.blogspot.com
COMPETENCIA Y REGULACIÓN : Sexo, mentiras y efectos de red. Sobre la compra de WhatsApp por parte de Facebook
http://derechocompetencia.blogspot.com/2017/01/sexo-mentiras-y-efectos-de-red.html
8220;Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom” (F.A. Hayek). Domingo, 15 de enero de 2017. Sexo, mentiras y efectos de red. Sobre la compra de WhatsApp por parte de Facebook. El 3 de octubre de 2014 (. M7217 – Facebook/WhatsApp. La Comisión Europea autorizó la operación de concentración mediante la que Facebook adquirió el control de WhatsApp. La Comisión consideró que, según la información suministrada por las partes, la concentración. Según la ...
derechocompetencia.blogspot.com
COMPETENCIA Y REGULACIÓN : enero 2016
http://derechocompetencia.blogspot.com/2016_01_01_archive.html
8220;Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom” (F.A. Hayek). Martes, 26 de enero de 2016. Importaciones paralelas y sistemas de doble precio de los medicamentos: sobre el concepto de acuerdo en el sentido de las normas de defensa de la competencia. Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Ha confirmado la sentencia del juzgado de lo mercantil desestimando la demanda. Enlaces a esta entrada. Enviar por correo electrónico. Miércoles, 13 de enero de 2016.
competitionbulletin.com
Agreements | Competition Bulletin
https://competitionbulletin.com/category/agreements
August 3, 2016 · 5:07 pm. The passing-on “defence” after Sainsbury’s. The passing-on defence ie. whether the damages suffered by a purchaser of a product which has been the subject of a cartel are reduced if he passes on the overcharge to his own customers had, as Tristan Jones blogged a few years ago. Been the subject of much policy discussion but relatively little legal analysis in the English case law. That remained the position when the Competition Appeal Tribunal heard the claim in. Is in reality no...
competitionbulletin.com
fresh evidence | Competition Bulletin
https://competitionbulletin.com/tag/fresh-evidence
Tag Archives: fresh evidence. March 20, 2015 · 2:13 pm. Fresh grounds and evidence before the CAT. On the face of it, BT was the main winner in this week’s ruling from the Competition Appeal Tribunal: see. British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications. The passing-on “defence” after Sainsbury’s. Can several wrongs make a right? Gallaher v CMA in the Court of Appeal. Economic complexity: CAT vs High Court. The Freight-Forwarding Cartels in the General Court: Lessons on Leniency and Discretion.
competitionbulletin.com
Damages | Competition Bulletin
https://competitionbulletin.com/category/damages
August 3, 2016 · 5:07 pm. The passing-on “defence” after Sainsbury’s. The passing-on defence ie. whether the damages suffered by a purchaser of a product which has been the subject of a cartel are reduced if he passes on the overcharge to his own customers had, as Tristan Jones blogged a few years ago. Been the subject of much policy discussion but relatively little legal analysis in the English case law. That remained the position when the Competition Appeal Tribunal heard the claim in. Is in reality no...
competitionbulletin.com
Telecoms | Competition Bulletin
https://competitionbulletin.com/category/telecoms
March 20, 2015 · 2:13 pm. Fresh grounds and evidence before the CAT. On the face of it, BT was the main winner in this week’s ruling from the Competition Appeal Tribunal: see. British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications. December 11, 2014 · 11:26 am. The costs of intervening. There is an interesting little point on costs buried away in last week’s decision in the “Ethernet” disputes in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (see. BT plc v Cable and Wireless Worldwide Plc and others. Reversing the ...
competitionbulletin.com
Procedure | Competition Bulletin
https://competitionbulletin.com/category/procedure
July 27, 2016 · 12:41 pm. Can several wrongs make a right? Gallaher v CMA in the Court of Appeal. When a public body makes a mistake in its treatment of one person, can fairness require it to treat other people in the same way even if that means amplifying the effects of the mistake? According to the Court of Appeal in the latest instalment of the tobacco litigation. Nonetheless, the case raises some important questions. Firstly: what is the significance of detrimental reliance in an equal treatment case?