rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
Draft Chapters | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/mctaggarts-paradox/draft-chapters
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). McTaggart’s Paradox: Ch. 1. Introduction. McTaggart’s Paradox: Ch. 2. McTaggart’s Metaphysics. McTaggart’s Paradox: Ch. 3. The Argument. This is a draft for the 3rd Chapter of my book on McTaggart’s Paradox. In this chapter I go through the argument step by step, carefully elucidating the connections to the metaphysical assumptions outlined in Chapter 2. McTaggart’s Paradox: Ch. 4. The C Series. You are commen...
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
New Review of McTagggart’s Paradox | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/new-review-of-mctagggarts-paradox
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). New Review of McTagggart’s Paradox. December 12, 2016. A review of my book McTaggart’s Paradox written by Joshua Mozersky has just appeared in the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. It is extremely positive. Mozersky concludes his review thus:. Read the whole thing here: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Truth Will Out: The Struggle to Publish. 2 responses to “ New Review of McTagggart’s Paradox. View @RIngthor...
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
Scientific Essentialism: Modernising the Aristotelian View | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/scientific-essentialism
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). Scientific Essentialism: Modernising the Aristotelian View. Funded by the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. Scientific essentialism (scientifically informed Aristotelianism) is once again a focal point in metaphysics. Special attention is given to the idea that natural properties are powers, and the consequences of this idea for our conception of causation. Power-structuralism in Ancient Ontologies.
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
Books | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/mctaggarts-paradox-2
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). 2016) Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy. Mental Causation and Ontology. 2013) Oxford University Press. S C Gibb, E. J. Lowe, and R. D. Ingthorsson (Editors). Johanssonian Investigations: Essays in Honour of Ingvar Johansson on His Seventieth Birthday. 2013) Eide: Ontos Verlag. C Svennerlind, J. Åman, and R. D. Ingthorsson (Editors). 2002) Umeå Studies in Philosophy 5. Is time tensed or tenseless?
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
Project Description | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/scientific-essentialism/project-description
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). Scientific Essentialism: Modernising The Aristotelian View 2015-2017. Funded by a 186.000 project grant from. The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. In this project I will critically examine recent discussions of powers and their role in causation, on the basis of my previous research (in particular 2002, but see also 2007, 2013, and. How should the notion of mutual manifestation of powers be understood?
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
By Subjects | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/by-subjects
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). 2013, ‘ The Elusive Appearance of Time. In Johanssonian Investigations, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag: 304 16. 2009, ‘ Can Things Endure in Tenseless Time? Sats Nordic Journal of Philosophy. 2001, ‘ Temporal Parity and the Problem of Change. Sats Nordic Journal of Philosophy. 2000, ‘ Hur ska man förstå McTaggarts paradox? Filosofisk Tidskrift 21(3): 13 24. 1999, ‘ Understanding McTaggart’s Paradox. 67 (1): 55 80.
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
rognvalduringthorsson | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/author/rognvalduringthorsson
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). Brief Review of Mario Bunge’s Causality and Modern Science. January 13, 2017. Causality and Modern Science by Mario Bunge My rating: 5 of 5 stars I regard this book as an essential reading for anyone wanting to engage with the philosophical issue […]. Read Article →. New Review of McTagggart’s Paradox. December 12, 2016. Read Article →. Truth Will Out: The Struggle to Publish. May 21, 2016. Read Article →.
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
By Dates | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/publications
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). Books and Edited Volumes, see here. 2015, ‘ The Regress of Pure Powers Revisited. The European Journal of Philosophy. 2013, ‘ The Natural vs. Human Sciences: Myth, Methodology, and Ontology. 2013, ‘ Properties: Qualities, Powers, or Both? 67 (1): 55 80. 2009, ‘ Can Things Endure in Tenseless Time? Sats Nordic Journal of Philosophy. 2008, ‘ The Logical vs Ontological Understanding of Conditions. 2000, ‘ Hur ska...
rdingthorsson.wordpress.com
Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox | Valdi ingthorsson
https://rdingthorsson.wordpress.com/summary-of-mctaggarts-paradox
Philosophy of the Natural World. Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. McTaggart’s Paradox (2012 14). Summary of McTaggart’s Paradox. Offers a comprehensive and critical overview of the last century of debate about McTaggart’s argument for the unreality of time. Its conclusion is that both defenders and critics have been wrong about the argument. It is not a self-contained argument that does not rely on any contentious ontological principles, but relies on the ontological principles of McTaggart’s. Metaphysics...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT