scienceinthesands.blogspot.com
Science in the Sands: November 2011
http://scienceinthesands.blogspot.com/2011_11_01_archive.html
Wednesday, November 30, 2011. Support the stackexchange for computational science. There is a new site on stackexchange for discussing computational science. Please come participate - there are already some great discussions. The site is now in public beta, so you don't need an invitation. In case you don't know about stackexchange, you may also be interested in the folowing:. Http:/ math.stackexchange.com/. Http:/ physics.stackexchange.com/. Posted by David Ketcheson. Links to this post. 2 Whenever I im...
webscio.wordpress.com
WebScio – Where ideas live | WebScio
https://webscio.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/webscio-where-ideas-live
The pyramid of Open Science – Which way is up? Topify Storyline or Related Stories 2.0 →. March 13, 2012 · 4:32 PM. WebScio – Where ideas live. So, with all that said, and after having successfully launched PaperCritic. 8211; where ideas live! The pyramid of Open Science – Which way is up? Topify Storyline or Related Stories 2.0 →. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Enter your comment here. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Address never made public). Notify me of new comments via email.
kevinthelibrarian.wordpress.com
March 2013 – Kevin the Librarian
https://kevinthelibrarian.wordpress.com/2013/03
Librarians working in data management: How to avoid a data management nightmare. Why librarians can’t ignore data anymore. PLOS’s open data fever dream. The study about dark data Allen Dearry was referring to journals.plos.org/plosone/articl. Links to GitHub and OSF project for NYU Data Catalog osf.io/vg7rn/. On NYU Data Catalog datacatalog.med.nyu.edu. Also linking to @ NIH BD2K. Libraries. data. education. Altmetrics and Evaluating Scholarly Impact: What’s out there and how can we participate? And woul...
api.plos.org
PLOS API | - Part 2
http://api.plos.org/page/2
Newer posts →. Winners of the Mendeley/PLoS API Binary Battle. November 30, 2011. PLoS and Mendeley, the popular reference manager and academic social network, teamed up to create a Binary Battle contest to build the best apps that make science more open using PLoS and/or Mendeley’s APIs (Application Programming Interface). For more information about the contest, see the Binary Battle. Post-publication peer review in an open environment. Rate papers, write critical reviews or read those from others.
api.plos.org
Richard Cave | PLOS API
http://api.plos.org/author/richard_cave
Author Archives: Richard Cave. Eating the PLOS API Dogfood. August 30, 2013. The PLOS ALM API is used by the PLOS journal websites, ALM Reports. And the PLOS Search. Indexer, altogether more than 8 million API requests every month. Martin Fenner wrote a post on his work with the PLOS ALM API. He talks about making an API that is simple, fast, and fun to use. Upcoming Release of ALM 2.0 on July 31. July 18, 2012. And at https:/ github.com/articlemetrics/alm/wiki/API. November 30, 2011. Share your personal...
api.plos.org
Winners of the Mendeley/PLoS API Binary Battle | PLOS API
http://api.plos.org/2011/11/30/winners-of-the-mendeleyplos-api-binary-battle
Science Hack Day San Francisco. Upcoming Release of ALM 2.0 on July 31 →. Winners of the Mendeley/PLoS API Binary Battle. November 30, 2011. PLoS and Mendeley, the popular reference manager and academic social network, teamed up to create a Binary Battle contest to build the best apps that make science more open using PLoS and/or Mendeley’s APIs (Application Programming Interface). For more information about the contest, see the Binary Battle. Research impact is now crowd sourced. Future impact of re...
webscio.wordpress.com
The pyramid of Open Science – Which way is up? | WebScio
https://webscio.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/the-pyramid-of-open-science-which-way-is-up
A proactive approach to making peer review more transparent. WebScio – Where ideas live →. January 3, 2012 · 7:56 PM. The pyramid of Open Science – Which way is up? Having just read Dan Gezelter’s (now relatively old) post. Is it possible that we’re trying to tear down the ‘pyramid’ of science by approaching it from the wrong end completely, i.e. by trying to damage its foundation which is highly resistant, instead of moving the more loose bricks at the top first? WebScio – Where ideas live →. This post ...
webscio.wordpress.com
WebScio | Blueprints for the Web | Page 2
https://webscio.wordpress.com/page/2
Newer posts →. October 25, 2011 · 7:42 PM. A proactive approach to making peer review more transparent. It seems that every second blog post. Written, talk given. Going somewhat in this direction RePEc. Have recently issued a call to editors. October 21, 2011 · 6:46 PM. Looking forward to the Open Science Summit 2011. As you might be aware of already, the Open Science Summit 2011. As can be seen from this comparison between blog posts and letters to the editor. See this blog post. If this trend continues...
webscio.wordpress.com
May | 2012 | WebScio
https://webscio.wordpress.com/2012/05
Monthly Archives: May 2012. May 11, 2012 · 11:35 AM. Want to write a review? Pick your format of choice! Last week, I summarized. Some of the main issues with the recent approaches to post-publication peer review (PPPR), such as comments and different types of altmetrics. The conclusion was that, while these approaches have a certain amount of potential, they usually fail to reach a high quality level, predominantly due to their very short and unstructured nature. In fact, there is no reason why smaller ...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT