SPORTVISION.COM

slate.com

FoxTrax glowing puck: Was it the worst blunder in TV sports history, or was it just ahead of its time?

http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2014/01/foxtrax_glowing_puck_was_it_the_worst_blunder_in_tv_sports_history_or_was.html

How Fox’s Reviled Glowing Puck Lit the Way for Sports Television Greatness. How Fox’s Reviled Glowing Puck Lit the Way for Sports Television Greatness. Jan 28 2014 7:45 AM. Was Fox’s glowing puck the worst blunder in TV sports history, or was it just ahead of its time? Back in the dark ages of sports CGI, the engineers tasked with making a hockey puck glow, were skeptical. “When I first learned about the project, I wondered,. Could it even be done? Rdquo; Cavallaro wrote in a first-hand account. Hard-cor...

intlalliances.com

going global international interviews podcasts by global american technology alliances

http://www.intlalliances.com/podcasts.htm

Interview with local tech exec, Terry Tierney, on opportunities in Iraq. Interview with David Laverty of International Counsel. Who explains how to avoid legal hurdles when expanding overseas. Interview with Ed Hamburg who tells how SPSS expanded overseas. Interview with Dr. Kai Lucks. Formerly of Siemens AG, and currently the president of the German Federal M&A Association. And the CEO of the Merger Management Institute. Interview with Minister Ahmed Omar Gagale. Founder and president A.J. Singh. And is...

killtown.blogspot.com

Killtown: Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-they-didnt-use-planes-to-hit-wtc.html

Questioning the 9/11 attacks. May 31, 2007. Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC. For those who ask:. Why would the government fake crashing planes into the WTC towers and thereby also having to fake all the crash videos when it would be much easier for them to crash real planes into them? Here is why they didn't use real planes to crash into the WTC and used TV fakery. Why do most of Americans still think planes brought down the Twin Towers? Because to them, the official story. For 9/11 conspiracis...

learncomputervision.com

Companies | Learn Computer Vision

http://www.learncomputervision.com/companies

Giving machines the power of vision. Here is a list of companies and organizations that are using computer vision. Santa Ana, California). Lane departure and collision warning systems for trucks and cars. Used in over 100,000 vehicles (2009) Also creates traffic monitoring systems. Vision systems that warn automobile drivers of danger, provide adaptive cruise control, and give driver assistance. Eye and Head Tracking. New Jersey, USA). Free-head eye-tracker using computer vision technologies. Systems for...

sageandspirit.blogspot.com

Instant History: January 2009

http://sageandspirit.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html

We are living on a threshold. We have the technology, the science, the people, and the power to save the world. We are also capable of destroying everything in an instant. Which one will it be? Wednesday, January 28, 2009. The Thin Yellow Line. For those of you who live in holes (or Detroit), The Yellow Line shows us how far the team has to go to get a first down. Sometimes, there will also be a blue line to show the line of scrimmage, or if it's a fourth down, The Yellow Line will turn red (Danger!

911mashie.blogspot.com

Video Fakery / TV Fakery: "TV fakery is 'crap'" "Wait, No it's not!"

http://911mashie.blogspot.com/2008/08/tv-fakery-is-crap-wait-no-its-not.html

Very briefly it went something like this:. The big takeaways are that the whole thing was engineered and supported by the National Security Council and the Bush regime. There wasn't any external terrorist threat. The most important weapon used on 9/11 was the mass media. The media were directly involved in the attacks and we can prove that they aired fake videos on 9/11. Some of the actors who pretended to be eyewitnesses have now been exposed. For the best introduction and starting point on TV Fakery.

ikehall.blogspot.com

Ike's Baseball Blog: Corrections part 3: Almost there...maybe?

http://ikehall.blogspot.com/2013/03/corrections-part-3-almost-theremaybe.html

Where I do baseball things. Thursday, March 28, 2013. Corrections part 3: Almost there.maybe? I wanted to make things as simple as possible for this first test, so I took a stadium that is known to deviate from the league norm strongly in at least one observable parameter. Tampa Bay in 2012 fit that bill, as was described by Jon Roegele here. Next, I wanted to find 2 games that fit the following criteria:. I - The same starting pitchers went against each other in each game. On July 24 Jeremy Hellickson a...

ikehall.blogspot.com

Ike's Baseball Blog: Part 6: More thoughts

http://ikehall.blogspot.com/2013/04/part-6-more-thoughts.html

Where I do baseball things. Saturday, April 13, 2013. Part 6: More thoughts. So when I decided to come back to PITCHf/x I noticed two things: 1) Josh's correction method never really gained widespread adoption, possibly because it was pulled down when he was hired by the Rays and 2.) The calibration issues still had not been completely eliminated. It was Jon Roegele's article. So that was why I tried an affine transform first. It almost worked. But not quite. Lets go the other way, using only Hellickson:.

ikehall.blogspot.com

Ike's Baseball Blog: Comments

http://ikehall.blogspot.com/2013/03/comments.html

Where I do baseball things. Thursday, March 21, 2013. It has been brought to my attention that the comments here are broken. I'm trying to fix it. Please bear with me. Also, feel free to test that by posting a comment. I can't seem to fix that right now, so send comments on the twitter to @TweeterDeMonkey. This is a test. March 21, 2013 at 11:52 PM. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom). The Physics of Baseball. View my complete profile. Simple template. Powered by Blogger.