indconlawphil.wordpress.com
“Historically respectable personalities”: The Supreme Court invents a new exception to free speech | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2015/05/14/historically-respectable-personalities-the-supreme-court-invents-a-new-exception-to-free-speech
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. Directive Principles of State Policy: An analytical approach – II: The Constituent Assembly, Article 37 and the Early Days. Land Boundary Agreements and the Constitution – I: The Bangladesh Land Swap →. May 14, 2015 · 11:46 am. 8220;Historically respectable personalities”: The Supreme Court invents a new exception to free speech. When the Supreme Court struck down S. 66A of the IT Act in. Shreya Singhal vs Union of India. 8221;, but rather with. On both counts, c...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Regressive Laws | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/regressive-laws-database
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. To add to this list, please email gautambhatia1988@gmail.com). 1 S 124A, IPC (Sedition). What the Law says:. Either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection. 2 S 153A(1)(a), IPC (promoting disharmony between groups). What the Law says:. Whoever – by words. 3 S 295A, IPC (insulting religious sentiments). What the Law says:. Either s...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VI: The Discontents of Air India v Nargesh Mirza | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2015/08/12/sex-discrimination-and-the-constitution-vi-the-discontents-of-air-india-v-nargesh-mirza
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. The Right to Privacy and the Supreme Court’s Referral: Two Constitutional Questions. Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VII: The Retreat from Nargesh Mirza in MacKinnon Mackenzie →. August 12, 2015 · 7:43 am. Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VI: The Discontents of Air India v Nargesh Mirza. With the exception of its 1954 judgment,. Air India v Nargesh Mirza. On marriage (if they married within four years of joining the service),. The first round o...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Articles | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/articles
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. This is a curated list of academic articles on various aspects of Indian constitutional law. Please send in your suggestions (with hyperlinks, if available). PK Tripathi, ‘The Fiasco of Overruling. 8220;, AIR 1990 (J) 1. B Civil Liberties and National Security. 1 M Satish and A. Chandra, ‘Of Maternal State and Minimalist Judiciary: The Indian Supreme Court’s Approach to Terror-Related Adjudication’, (2009) 21(1). National Law School of India Review. Glaring Conce...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy | A topnotch WordPress.com site | Page 2
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/page/2
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. Newer posts →. October 1, 2016 · 8:11 am. The Bihar High Court’s Prohibition Judgment: Key Constitutional Issues – II: The Fundamental Right to Privacy. Of the Constitution, one of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which stated that:. Of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health. In other words, since Article 47 expressly. The State taking legislative measures towards prohibition, the imposition of prohibition (if done in the correct ...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Book Reviews | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/book-reviews
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. 1 M Suresh and S. Narrain (eds).,. The Shifting Scales of Justice: The Supreme Court in Neo-Liberal India. 2 Jeremy Waldron,. The Harm in Hate Speech. 3 Giorgio Agamben,. 4 Kenji Yoshino, A Thousand Times More Fair: What Shakespeare’s Plays Teach Us About Justice. One response to “. Pingback: New Pages on the Blog: A Summary Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Enter your comment here. Address never made public). The Bihar High Co...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VII: The Retreat from Nargesh Mirza in MacKinnon Mackenzie | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/sex-discrimination-and-the-constitution-vii-the-retreat-from-nargesh-mirza-in-mackinnon-mackenzie
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VI: The Discontents of Air India v Nargesh Mirza. Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VIII: The further discontents of Air India Cabin Crew vs Yeshaswinee Merchant →. August 13, 2015 · 3:50 am. Sex Discrimination and the Constitution – VII: The Retreat from Nargesh Mirza in MacKinnon Mackenzie. In the previous essay, we noted the analytical problems with the Supreme Court’s judgment in. Air India vs Nargesh Mirza.
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Guest Post Guidelines | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/guest-post-guidelines
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. In keeping with its objective of creating and sustaining a forum for constitutional discussion, and of promoting a diversity of viewpoints, arguments and ideologies, ICLP welcomes guest essays from students, academics, practitioners (and just about everyone else! A) The essay should be. Between 1000 and 1500 words in length. B) The essay should bear a reasonable nexus to an aspect of constitutional law [1] (a fairly low standard of scrutiny). While hugely importa...
indconlawphil.wordpress.com
Progressive Cases | Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/progressive-constitutional-interpretations
Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. This page aims to collate Supreme Court and High Court cases that advance a progressive, civil-rights oriented vision of Indian constitutional law. Please leave suggestions in the comments section, or email them to gautambhatia1988@gmail.com. 1 T Sareetha v. T. Venkata Subbaiah, AIR 1983 AP 356. In this case, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that S. 9. 1 Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi, WP(C) No. 7455/2001 (2009). The Punjab-Haryana High Court held...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT