possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com
B entails that a conjunction of determinate truths is determinate | Possibly Philosophy
https://possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/b-entails-that-a-conjunction-of-determinate-truths-is-determinate
Weblog devoted to the philosophy of language, metaphysics and philosophical logic. Laquo; Interpreting the third truth value in Kripke’s theory of truth. B entails that a conjunction of determinate truths is determinate. October 26, 2010. I know it’s been quiet for a while around here. I have finally finished a paper on higher order vagueness. What could the premisses be that give such a paradoxical conclusion? Is the conjunction of. And so on, distributivity easily gives us (1). Given a logic of K.
possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com
Is ZFC Arithmetically Sound? | Possibly Philosophy
https://possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/is-zfc-arithmetically-sound
Weblog devoted to the philosophy of language, metaphysics and philosophical logic. Laquo; Truth as an operator and as a predicate. Interpreting the third truth value in Kripke’s theory of truth. Is ZFC Arithmetically Sound? February 12, 2010. I recently stumbled across this. Fascinating discussion on FOM. The question at stake: why should we believe that ZFC doesn’t prove any false statements about numbers? That is, while of course we should believe ZFC is consistent and. It is also instructive to consid...
possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com
Interpreting the third truth value in Kripke’s theory of truth | Possibly Philosophy
https://possiblyphilosophy.wordpress.com/2010/03/28/interpreting-the-third-truth-value-in-kripkes-theory-of-truth
Weblog devoted to the philosophy of language, metaphysics and philosophical logic. Laquo; Is ZFC Arithmetically Sound? B entails that a conjunction of determinate truths is determinate. Interpreting the third truth value in Kripke’s theory of truth. March 28, 2010. Receive the same value. In particular, we have the resources to say that the liar sentence does not express a proposition:. I want to suggest a third interpretation. The basic idea is that, unlike the second interpretation, there is a sens...
longwordsbotherme.blogspot.com
Long Words Bother Me: September 2007
http://longwordsbotherme.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html
Long Words Bother Me. Friday, September 28, 2007. Another Post, Another Paper. This time it's all about explanation. This is the paper I'm planning to give to the Aristotelian Society in November, so quite a different sort of intended audience from the Compass paper, but I'm still aiming for accessibility to philosophers in general. The paper's called Romeo, René and the Reasons Why. Though you'll have to read it to find out why. Comments, as always, encouraged. Tuesday, September 18, 2007. Apologies for...
longwordsbotherme.blogspot.com
Long Words Bother Me: November 2007
http://longwordsbotherme.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html
Long Words Bother Me. Sunday, November 18, 2007. Arche Basic Knowledge Workshop. Yesterday I attended the first day of the 1st Arché Basic Knowledge Workshop. Unfortunately I’m missing the second day.) There were papers by Ernie Sosa. Tuesday, November 13, 2007. Caret and Cotnoir on Jenkins on Beall. Have written a reply to my paper 'True, False, Paranormal and Designated: A Reply to Beall'. Their paper is due to appear in July's. Friday, November 02, 2007. Subscribe to: Posts (Atom).
boramlee.wordpress.com
Contra Nagarjuna | Footnotes to Hume
https://boramlee.wordpress.com/2007/10/28/contra-nagarjuna
Has an excellent translation and commentary. Of the Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna’s. 8220;The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way”). And this reminds me of a problem I had while reading this book: Nagarjuna’s arguments seem to beg the question. Below I explain why. 8230;it does not exist “from its own side”. As the object that it is. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. As far as I can see, Nagarjuna argues for the emptiness of phenomena mostly by. It is mind-dependent and hence conventional.
